Evaluation of the GenBank, EzTaxon, and BIBI Services for Molecular Identification of Clinical Blood Culture Isolates That Were Unidentifiable or Misidentified by Conventional Methods

Evaluation of the GenBank, EzTaxon, and BIBI Services for Molecular Identification of Clinical Blood Culture Isolates That Were Unidentifiable or Misidentified by Conventional Methods

Authors
Park, KS[Park, Kyung Sun]Ki, CS[Ki, Chang-Seok]Kang, CI[Kang, Cheol-In]Kim, YJ[Kim, Yae-Jean]Chung, DR[Chung, Doo Ryeon]Peck, KR[Peck, Kyong Ran]Song, JH[Song, Jae-Hoon]Lee, NY[Lee, Nam Yong]
Issue Date
May-2012
Publisher
AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
Citation
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, v.50, no.5, pp.1792 – 1795
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY
Volume
50
Number
5
Start Page
1792
End Page
1795
URI
scholarworks.bwise.kr/skku/handle/2021.sw.skku/65486
DOI
10.1128/JCM.00081-12
ISSN
0095-1137
Abstract
We compared the 16S rRNA gene sequencing results analyzed with the GenBank, EzTaxon, and BIBI databases for blood culture specimens for which identifications were incomplete, conflicting, or unidentifiable using conventional methods. Analyses performed using GenBank combined with EzTaxon (kappa = 0.79) were more discriminative than those using other databases alone or in combination with a second database.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
Medicine > Department of Medicine > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.


Read more here: Source link