Andrés, F. & Coupland, G. The genetic basis of flowering responses to seasonal cues. Nat. Rev. Genet. 13, 627–639 (2012).
Komiya, R., Ikegami, A., Tamaki, S., Yokoi, S. & Shimamoto, K. Hd3a and RFT1 are essential for flowering in rice. Development 135, 767–774 (2008).
Tamaki, S., Matsuo, S., Wong, H. L., Yokoi, S. & Shimamoto, K. Hd3a protein is a mobile flowering signal in rice. Science 316, 1033–1036 (2007).
Komiya, R., Yokoi, S. & Shimamoto, K. A gene network for long-day flowering activates RFT1 encoding a mobile flowering signal in rice. Development 136, 3443–3450 (2009).
Wickland, D. & Hanzawa, Y. The FLOWERING LOCUS T/TERMINAL FLOWER1 gene family: functional evolution and molecular mechanisms. Mol. Plant 8, 983–997 (2015).
Taoka, K. et al. 14-3-3 proteins act as intracellular receptors for rice Hd3a florigen. Nature 476, 332–335 (2011).
Yano, M. et al. Hd1, a major photoperiod sensitivity quantitative trait locus in rice, is closely related to the Arabidopsis flowering time gene CONSTANS. Plant Cell 12, 2473–2484 (2000).
Whipple, C. J. Grass inflorescence architecture and evolution: the origin of novel signaling centers. N. Phytol. 216, 367–372 (2017).
Gómez-Ariza, J. et al. A transcription factor coordinating internode elongation and photoperiodic signals in rice. Nat. Plants 5, 358–362 (2019).
Izawa, T. et al. Phytochrome mediates the external light signal to repress FT orthologs in photoperiodic flowering of rice. Genes Dev. 16, 2006–2020 (2002).
Brambilla, V. et al. Antagonistic transcription factor complexes modulate the floral transition in rice. Plant Cell 29, 2801–2816 (2017).
Goretti, D. et al. Transcriptional and post-transcriptional mechanisms limit Heading Date 1 (Hd1) function to adapt rice to high latitudes. PLoS Genet. 13, e1006530 (2017).
Tsuda, K., Ito, Y., Sato, Y. & Kurata, N. Positive autoregulation of a KNOX gene is essential for shoot apical meristem maintenance in rice. Plant Cell 23, 4368–4381 (2011).
Asano, T. et al. Rpp16 and Rpp17, from a common origin, have different protein characteristics but both genes are predominantly expressed in rice phloem tissues. Plant Cell Physiol. 43, 668–674 (2002).
Zhang, W. et al. Precise and heritable gene targeting in rice using a sequential transformation strategy. Cell Rep. Methods 3, 100389 (2023).
Gómez-Ariza, J. et al. Loss of floral repressor function adapts rice to higher latitudes in Europe. J. Exp. Bot. 66, 2027–2039 (2015).
Rigola, D. et al. High-throughput detection of induced mutations and natural variation using KeyPointTM technology. PLoS ONE 4, e4761 (2009).
Ho, W. W. H. & Weigel, D. Structural features determining flower-promoting activity of Arabidopsis FLOWERING LOCUS T. Plant Cell 26, 552–564 (2014).
Pires, D. E. V., Ascher, D. B. & Blundell, T. L. DUET: a server for predicting effects of mutations on protein stability using an integrated computational approach. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, W314-9 (2014).
Andrés, F. et al. SHORT VEGETATIVE PHASE reduces gibberellin biosynthesis at the Arabidopsis shoot apex to regulate the floral transition. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, E2760–E2769 (2014).
Zhu, W. et al. Rice SEPALLATA genes OsMADS5 and OsMADS34 cooperate to limit inflorescence branching by repressing the TERMINAL FLOWER1-like gene RCN4. N. Phytol. 233, 1682–1700 (2022).
Kobayashi, K. et al. Inflorescence meristem identity in rice is specified by overlapping functions of three AP1/FUL-like MADS box genes and PAP2, a SEPALLATA MADS box gene. Plant Cell 24, 1848–1859 (2012).
Prasad, K., Parameswaran, S. & Vijayraghavan, U. OsMADS1, a rice MADS-box factor, controls differentiation of specific cell types in the lemma and palea and is an early-acting regulator of inner floral organs. Plant J. 43, 915–928 (2005).
Lu, Z. et al. Genome-wide binding analysis of the transcription activator ideal plant architecture1 reveals a complex network regulating rice plant architecture. Plant Cell 25, 3743–3759 (2013).
Wang, L. et al. Coordinated regulation of vegetative and reproductive branching in rice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 15504–15509 (2015).
Jiao, Y. et al. Regulation of OsSPL14 by OsmiR156 defines ideal plant architecture in rice. Nat. Genet. 42, 541–544 (2010).
Miura, K. et al. OsSPL14 promotes panicle branching and higher grain productivity in rice. Nat. Genet. 42, 545–549 (2010).
Wang, L. et al. Bract suppression regulated by the miR156/529–SPLs–NL1–PLA1 module is required for the transition from vegetative to reproductive branching in rice. Mol. Plant 14, 1168–1184 (2021).
Cerise, M. et al. OsFD4 promotes the rice floral transition via florigen activation complex formation in the shoot apical meristem. N. Phytol. 229, 429–443 (2021).
Kaur, A., Nijhawan, A., Yadav, M. & Khurana, J. P. OsbZIP62/OsFD7, a functional ortholog of FLOWERING LOCUS D, regulates floral transition and panicle development in rice. J. Exp. Bot. 72, 7826–7845 (2021).
Miki, D., Zhang, W., Zeng, W., Feng, Z. & Zhu, J. K. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene targeting in Arabidopsis using sequential transformation. Nat. Commun. 9, 1967 (2018).
Miki, D. et al. CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing toolbox for Arabidopsis thaliana. Methods Mol. Biol. 2200, 121–146 (2021).
AL-Tam, F. et al. P-TRAP: a panicle trait phenotyping tool. BMC Plant Biol. 13, 122 (2013).
Lowder, L. G. et al. A CRISPR/Cas9 toolbox for multiplexed plant genome editing and transcriptional regulation. Plant Physiol. 169, 971–985 (2015).
Miao, J. et al. Targeted mutagenesis in rice using CRISPR–Cas system. Cell Res. 23, 1233–1236 (2013).
Sahoo, K. K., Tripathi, A. K., Pareek, A., Sopory, S. K. & Singla-Pareek, S. L. An improved protocol for efficient transformation and regeneration of diverse indica rice cultivars. Plant Methods 7, 49 (2011).
Toriba, T. et al. Suppression of leaf blade development by BLADE-ON-PETIOLE orthologs is a common strategy for underground rhizome growth. Curr. Biol. 30, 509–516.e3 (2020).
Betti, C. et al. Sequence-specific protein aggregation generates defined protein knockdowns in plants. Plant Physiol. 171, 773–787 (2016).
Abbruscato, P. et al. OsWRKY22, a monocot wrky gene, plays a role in the resistance response to blast. Mol. Plant Pathol. 13, 828–841 (2012).
Read more here: Source link