Aase K, Jensen H, Muff S (2022) Genomic estimation of quantitative genetic parameters in wild admixed populations. Meth Ecol Evol 13:1014–1026
Aitken SN, Bemmels JB (2015) Time to get moving: Assisted gene flow of forest trees. Evol Appl 9:271–290
Alberto F et al. (2013) Potential for evolutionary responses to climate change – evidence from tree populations. Global Change Biol 19:1645–1661
Alberto F et al. (2011) Adaptive responses for seed and leaf phenology in natural populations of sessile oak along an altitudinal gradient. J Evolut Biol 24:1442–1454
Alía R, Chambel R, Notivol E, Climent J, González-Martínez SC (2014) Environment-dependent microevolution in a Mediterranean pine (Pinus pinaster Aiton). BMC Evol Biol 14:1–12
Anderegg LDL et al. (2021) Aridity drives coordinated trait shifts but not decreased trait variance across the geographic range of eight Australian trees. New Phytologist 229:1375–1387
Archambeau J et al. (2022) Combining climatic and genomic data improves range-wide tree height growth prediction in a forest tree. Am Naturalist 200:E141–E159
Barton NH (1990) Pleiotropic models of quantitative variation. Genetics 124:773–782
Benavides R et al. (2021) Phenotypes of Pinus sylvestris are more coordinated under local harsher conditions across Europe. J Ecol 109:2580–2596
Benito Garzón M, Robson TM, Hampe A (2019) ΔTraitSDMs: Species distribution models that account for local adaptation and phenotypic plasticity. New Phytol 222:1757–1765
Bigler C, Veblen TT (2009) Increased early growth rates decrease longevities of conifers in subalpine forests. Oikos 118:1130–1138
Bucci G et al. (2007) Range-wide phylogeography and gene zones in Pinus pinaster Ait. revealed by chloroplast microsatellite markers. Mol Ecol 16:2137–2153
Buffalo V (2021) Quantifying the relationship between genetic diversity and population size suggests natural selection cannot explain Lewontin’s Paradox. eLife 10:e67509
Byers DL (2005) Evolution in heterogeneous environments and the potential of maintenance of genetic variation in traits of adaptive significance. Genetics of Adapt107–124. doi.org/10.1007/s10709-003-2721-5.
Carley LN, Morris WF, Walsh R, Riebe D, Mitchell-Olds T (2022) Are genetic variation and demographic performance linked? Evol Appl 15:1888–1906
Carpenter B et al. (2017) Stan: A probabilistic programming language. J Stat Softw 76 www.osti.gov/pages/biblio/1430202-stan-probabilistic-programming-language.
Charmantier A, Kruuk LEB, Blondel J, Lambrechts MM (2004) Testing for microevolution in body size in three blue tit populations. J Evol Biol 17:732–743
Colautti RI, Eckert CG, Barrett SCH (2010) Evolutionary constraints on adaptive evolution during range expansion in an invasive plant. Proc R Soc B: Biolog Sci 277:1799–1806
Conrad O et al. (2015) System for automated geoscientific analyses (SAGA) v. 2.1.4. Geosci Model Dev 8:1991–2007
Corcuera L, Gil-Pelegrin E, Notivol E (2010) Phenotypic plasticity in Pinus pinaster δ13C: Environment modulates genetic variation. Annals Forest Sci 67:812–812
Costa P, Durel CE (1996) Time trends in genetic control over height and diameter in maritime pine. Can J Forest Res 26:1209–1217
de- Lucas AI, Robledo-Arnuncio JJ, Hidalgo E, González-Martínez SC (2008) Mating system and pollen gene flow in mediterranean maritime pine. Heredity 100:390–399
de Miguel M et al. (2022) Polygenic adaptation and negative selection across traits, years and environments in a long-lived plant species (Pinus pinaster Ait., Pinaceae). Mol Ecol. doi.org/10.1111/mec.16367.
Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK (2003) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: Linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics 164:1567–1587
Felsenstein J (1976) The theoretical population genetics of variable selection and migration. Ann Rev Gen 10:253–280
Fisher RA (1930) The genetical theory of natural selection. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Frankham R (1996) Relationship of genetic variation to population size in wildlife. Conserv Biol 10:1500–1508
Gaspar MJ, Velasco T, Feito I, Alía R, Majada J (2013) Genetic variation of drought tolerance in Pinus pinaster at three hierarchical levels: A comparison of induced osmotic stress and field testing. PLOS ONE 8:e79094
Gauzere J et al. (2020) Where is the optimum? Predicting the variation of selection along climatic gradients and the adaptive value of plasticity. A case study on tree phenology. Evol Lett 4:109–123
Gibson G, Dworkin I (2004) Uncovering cryptic genetic variation. Nat Rev Genetics 5:681–690
González-Martínez SC, Alía R, Gil L (2002) Population genetic structure in a Mediterranean pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.): A comparison of allozyme markers and quantitative traits. Heredity 89:199–206
González-Martínez SC et al. (2007) Spatial genetic structure of an explicit glacial refugium of maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Aiton) insoutheastern Spain. In Weiss, S. & Ferrand, N. (eds.) Phylogeography of southern european refugia: Evolutionary perspectives on the origins and conservation of European biodiversity. Springer, Netherlands, 2007, p 257–269 doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4904-8_9.
Grattapaglia D, Plomion C, Kirst M, Sederoff RR (2009) Genomics of growth traits in forest trees. Curr Opinion Plant Biol 12:148–156
Grivet D et al. (2011) Molecular footprints of local adaptation in two mediterranean conifers. Mol Biol Evol 28:101–116
Hamrick JL (2004) Response of forest trees to global environmental changes. Forest Ecol Manag 197:323–335
Hedrick PW (1986) Genetic polymorphism in heterogeneous environments: A decade later. Annual Rev Ecol Syst 17:535–566
Hedrick PW (2006) Genetic polymorphism in heterogeneous environments: The age of genomics. Annual Rev Ecol, Evol Syst 37:67–93
Hereford J, Hansen TF, Houle D (2004) Comparing strengths of directional selection: How strong is strong? Evolution 58:2133–2143
Hiederer, R., European Commission, Joint Research Centre & Institute for Environment and Sustainability. Mapping Soil Properties for Europe Spatial Representation of Soil Database Attributes. (Publications Office of the European Union, 2013).
Hoffmann AA, Parsons P (1991) Evolutionary genetics and environmental stress. Oxford University Press agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=US201300695279.
Huang Y, Stinchcombe JR, Agrawal AF (2015) Quantitative genetic variance in experimental fly populations evolving with or without environmental heterogeneity. Evolution 69:2735–2746
Hurel A et al. (2021) Genetic basis of growth, spring phenology, and susceptibility to biotic stressors in maritime pine. Evol Appl 14:2750–2772
Jaramillo-Correa J-P et al. (2015) Molecular proxies for climate maladaptation in a long-lived tree (Pinus pinaster Aiton, Pinaceae). Genetics 199:793–807
Johnson GR, Sniezko RA, Mandel NL (1997) Age trends in Douglas-fir genetic parameters and implications for optimum selection age. Silvae Genetica 46:349–358
Johnson T, Barton NH (2005) Theoretical models of selection and mutation on quantitative traits. Phil Trans R Soc B: Biol Sci 360:1411–1425
Jump AS, Peñuelas J (2005) Running to stand still: Adaptation and the response of plants to rapid climate change. Ecol Lett 8:1010–1020
Körner, C. Alpine plant diversity: A global survey and functional interpretations. In Chapin, F. S. & Körner, C. (eds.) Arctic and Alpine Biodiversity: Patterns, Causes and Ecosystem Consequences, Ecological Studies, 45-62 (Springer, 1995). doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-78966-3_4.
Kremer A et al. (2012) Long-distance gene flow and adaptation of forest trees to rapid climate change. Ecol Lett 15:378–392
Kroon J, Ericsson T, Jansson G, Andersson B (2011) Patterns of genetic parameters for height in field genetic tests of Picea abies and Pinus sylvestris in Sweden. Tree Genet Genomes 7:1099–1111
Kurt Y, González-Martínez SC, Alía R, Isik K (2012) Genetic differentiation in Pinus brutia Ten. using molecular markers and quantitative traits: The role of altitude. Annals Forest Sci 69:345–351
Kusnandar D, Galwey NW, Hertzler GL, Butcher TB (1998) Age trends in variances and heritabilities for diameter and height in maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.) in western Australia. Silvae Genetica 47:136–141
Lamy J-B et al. (2014) Limited genetic variability and phenotypic plasticity detected for cavitation resistance in a Mediterranean pine. New Phytol 201:874–886
Lande R, Shannon S (1996) The role of genetic variation in adaptation and population persistence in a changing environment. Evolution 50:434–437
Lawton-Rauh A (2008) Demographic processes shaping genetic variation. Curr Opinion Plant Biol 11:103–109
Ledón-Rettig CC, Pfennig DW, Chunco AJ, Dworkin I (2014) Cryptic genetic variation in natural populations: A predictive framework. Integr Comp Biol 54:783–793
Leimu R, Mutikainen P, Koricheva J, Fischer M (2006) How general are positive relationships between plant population size, fitness and genetic variation? J Ecol 94:942–952
Leites LP, Robinson AP, Rehfeldt GE, Marshall JD, Crookston NL (2012) Height-growth response to climatic changes differs among populations of Douglas-fir: A novel analysis of historic data. Ecol Appl 22:154–165
Lemoine NP (2019) Moving beyond noninformative priors: Why and how to choose weakly informative priors in Bayesian analyses. Oikos 128:912–928
Lepoittevin C et al. (2011) Genetic parameters of growth, straightness and wood chemistry traits in Pinus pinaster. Annals Forest Sci 68:873–884
Lerner, I. M. The genetic basis of selection. In The genetic basis of selection. (Chapman & Hall, Ltd., London & John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1958). www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/19591600905.
Levene H (1953) Genetic equilibrium when more than one ecological niche is available. Am Nat 87:331–333
Lin Y et al. (2013) Effect of genotype by spacing interaction on radiata pine genetic parameters for height and diameter growth. Forest Ecol Manag 304:204–211
Linhart YB, Grant MC (1996) Evolutionary significance of local genetic differentiation in plants. Annual Rev Ecol Syst 27:237–277
Mackay TFC (1981) Genetic variation in varying environments. Gen Res 37:79–93
Marchi M et al. (2020) ClimateEU, scale-free climate normals, historical time series, and future projections for Europe. Sci Data 7:428
McDonald TK, Yeaman S (2018) Effect of migration and environmental heterogeneity on the maintenance of quantitative genetic variation: A simulation study. J Evol Biol 31:1386–1399
Merilä J, Sheldon B, Kruuk L (2001) Explaining stasis: Microevolutionary studies in natural populations. Genetica 112:199–222
Merilä J, Söderman F, O’Hara R, Räsänen K, Laurila A (2004) Local adaptation and genetics of acid-stress tolerance in the moor frog, Rana arvalis. Conserv Gen 5:513–527
Mitchell PJ, Veneklaas EJ, Lambers H, Burgess SSO (2008) Leaf water relations during summer water deficit: Differential responses in turgor maintenance and variation in leaf structure among different plant communities in south-western Australia. Plant, Cell Environ 31:1791–1802
Mitchell-Olds T, Willis JH, Goldstein DB (2007) Which evolutionary processes influence natural genetic variation for phenotypic traits? Nat Rev Gen 8:845–856
Morgenstern, M. Geographic Variation in Forest Trees: Genetic Basis and Application of Knowledge in Silviculture (Vancouver: Univ. B.C. Press, 1996).
Neale DB, Savolainen O (2004) Association genetics of complex traits in conifers. Trends Plant Sci 9:325–330
Petit RJ, Hampe A (2006) Some evolutionary consequences of being a tree. Annual Rev Ecol Evol Syst 37:187–214
Plomion C et al. (2016) High-density SNP assay development for genetic analysis in maritime pine (Pinus pinaster). Mol Ecol Resources 16:574–587
Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (2020). www.R-project.org/.
Ramírez-Valiente JA, Etterson JR, Deacon NJ, Cavender-Bares J (2019) Evolutionary potential varies across populations and traits in the neotropical oak Quercus oleoides. Tree Physiol 39:427–439
Rehfeldt GE, Ying CC, Spittlehouse DL, Hamilton DA (1999) Genetic responses to climate in Pinus contorta: Niche breadth, climate change, and reforestation. Ecol Monogr 69:375–407
Reid JM, Arcese P (2020) Recent immigrants alter the quantitative genetic architecture of paternity in song sparrows. Evol Lett 4:124–136
Reynolds VA, Anderegg LDL, Loy X, HilleRisLambers J, Mayfield MM (2018) Unexpected drought resistance strategies in seedlings of four Brachychiton species. Tree Physiol 38:664–677
Richardson JL, Urban MC, Bolnick DI, Skelly DK (2014) Microgeographic adaptation and the spatial scale of evolution. Trends in Ecol Evol 29:165–176
Riley SJ, DeGloria SD, Elliot R (1999) Index that quantifies topographic heterogeneity. Intermountain J Sci 5:23–27
Robledo-Arnuncio JJ, Gil L (2005) Patterns of pollen dispersal in a small population of Pinus sylvestris L. revealed by total-exclusion paternity analysis. Heredity 94:13–22
Rodríguez-Quilón I et al. (2015) Local effects drive heterozygosity-fitness correlations in an outcrossing long-lived tree. Proc R Soc B: Biolog Sci 282:20152230
Rodríguez-Quilón I et al. (2016) Capturing neutral and adaptive genetic diversity for conservation in a highly structured tree species. Ecolog Appl 26:2254–2266
Santos-del Blanco L et al. (2022) On the feasibility of estimating contemporary effective population size (Ne) for genetic conservation and monitoring of forest trees. Biolog Conserv 273:109704
Savolainen O, Pyhäjärvi T, Knürr T (2007) Gene flow and local adaptation in trees. Annual Rev Ecol Evol Syst 38:595–619
Schlichting CD (2008) Hidden reaction norms, cryptic genetic variation, and evolvability. Annals NY Acad Sci 1133:187–203
Schuster WSF, Mitton JB (2000) Paternity and gene dispersal in limber pine (Pinus flexilis James). Heredity 84:348–361
Scotti I, González-Martínez SC, Budde KB, Lalagüe H (2016) Fifty years of genetic studies: What to make of the large amounts of variation found within populations? Annals Forest Sci 73:69–75
Scotti-Saintagne C et al. (2004) Detection of quantitative trait loci controlling bud burst and height growth in Quercus robur L. Theor Appl Genetics 109:1648–1659
Spichtig M, Kawecki TJ (2004) The maintenance (or not) of polygenic variation by soft selection in heterogeneous environments. Am Nat 164:70–84
Stein A, Gerstner K, Kreft H (2014) Environmental heterogeneity as a universal driver of species richness across taxa, biomes and spatial scales. Ecol Lett 17:866–880
Stock AJ, Campitelli BE, Stinchcombe JR (2014) Quantitative genetic variance and multivariate clines in the Ivyleaf morning glory, Ipomoea hederacea. Philosoph Trans R Soc B: Biolog Sci 369:20130259
Storfer A (1996) Quantitative genetics: A promising approach for the assessment of genetic variation in endangered species. Trends Ecol Evol 11:343–348
Thibault E, Soolanayakanahally R, Keller SR (2020) Latitudinal clines in bud flush phenology reflect genetic variation in chilling requirements in balsam poplar, Populus balsamifera. Am J Botany 107:1597–1605
Triantis KA, Mylonas M, Lika K, Vardinoyannis K (2003) A model for the species-area-habitat relationship. J Biogeogr 30:19–27
van Heerwaarden B et al. (2009) Testing evolutionary hypotheses about species borders: Patterns of genetic variation towards the southern borders of two rainforest Drosophila and a related habitat generalist. Proc R Soc B: Biol Sci 276:1517–1526
Viñas, R. A., Caudullo, G., Oliveira, S. & de Rigo, D. Pinus pinaster in Europe: Distribution, habitat, usage and threats (2016).
Vitasse, Y. V., Delzon, S. D., Bresson, C. C. B. C., Michalet, R. M. & Kremer, A. K. Altitudinal differentiation in growth and phenology among populations of temperate-zone tree species growing in a common garden. Canadian Journal of Forest Research (2009). doi.org/10.1139/X09-054.
Waddington CH (1953) Genetic assimilation of an acquired character. Evolution 7:118–126
Walsh B, Blows MW (2009) Abundant genetic variation + strong selection = multivariate genetic constraints: A geometric view of adaptation. Annual Rev Ecol Evol Syst 40:41–59
Walsh, B. & Lynch, M. Evolution and Selection of Quantitative Traits (Oxford University Press, 2018).
Warren CR, McGrath JF, Adams MA (2001) Water availability and carbon isotope discrimination in conifers. Oecologia 127:476–486
Willi Y, van Buskirk J, Hoffmann AA (2006) Limits to the adaptive potential of small populations. Annual Rev Ecol Evol Syst 37:433–458
Wood JLA, Tezel D, Joyal D, Fraser DJ (2015) Population size is weakly related to quantitative genetic variation and trait differentiation in a stream fish. Evolution 69:2303–2318
Wu HX, Ying CC (2004) Geographic pattern of local optimality in natural populations of lodgepole pine. Forest Ecol Manag 194:177–198
Yeaman S, Chen Y, Whitlock MC (2010) No effect of environmental heterogeneity on the maintenance of genetic variation in wing shape in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 64:3398–3408
Yeaman S et al. (2016) Convergent local adaptation to climate in distantly related conifers. Science 353:1431–1433
Yeaman S, Jarvis A (2006) Regional heterogeneity and gene flow maintain variance in a quantitative trait within populations of lodgepole pine. Proc R Soc B: Biolog Sci 273:1587–1593
Younginger BS, Sirová D, Cruzan MB, Ballhorn DJ (2017) Is biomass a reliable estimate of plant fitness? Appl Plant Sci 5:1600094
Read more here: Source link